pull down to refresh

By Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr.

Restoring the rule of law and Constitutional government on immigration—something wrecked by Trump’s rule-by-decree with federal agents—is vastly more important than expelling illegal immigrants.
110 sats \ 9 replies \ @Scoresby 4h
After killing Pretti, DHS officials seized cell phones of bystanders and blocked Minnesota state law enforcement officials from conducting any investigation at the crime scene. DHS’s apparent coverup was so brazen that a Trump-nominated federal judge issued an emergency order on Saturday near midnight ordering DHS not to destroy further evidence.

Didn't know about this.

He emphasizes that civil immigration violations do not justify criminal-style enforcement methods and has warned that ICE practices often erode due process norms.

This is my main concern. We are changing all kinds of expectations about how the state exercises its authority.

reply

Yeah, it's discouraging seeing so many people welcome these abuses of power because they fell into the hysteria about illegals.

reply
68 sats \ 3 replies \ @Scoresby 4h

Whatever tools we give the state will be turned against us. Just a matter of when.

reply

yawn

reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 1h

I don't think the meme applies.

In the context of the US, we have a constitution which supposedly limits the powers of the government. Thing needs to be interpreted though. How we do the interpretation is constantly being negotiated.

Setting a norm for an interpretation that says when using a third party, people have abdicated their fourth amendment protections weakens the cases where the fourth amendment used to be clear (I think we aren't far from US government arguing it has the right to review the data on your phone without a warrant).

Think about TSA: normalizing the suspension of rights in order to do something as basic as traveling because of 9/11 allows for people in government positions to argue for suspensions in similar but adjacent places (eg banking, using the internet).

Another case is the way congress likes to play games with their rules of order (no more filibuster, no need for a supermajority, etc). Once these things are removed, they'll be used by both parties. It's short sighted for whoever is in power to choose expedience over the protection afforded by such things. And things like a supermajority requirement on some votes can be a protection against tyranny...but it can also be dispensed with.

I believe that it is the case that some constraints on government power only hold as long as we keep them universally in place.

reply

Liberia has the same Constitution as USA

Judicial activism has made the Constitution meaningless, words on paper and nothing else

Rule of law is a myth

reply

Trump is a significant and dangerous escalation of presidential powers. Now, the next president will be able to use but Trump as an excuse to do their own sh*t

reply

Could also be a return to normalcy. Politics isn't linear.

reply

I hope so. but i wouldn't bet on it

reply

we should impeach him a third time!

reply

Trump honestly had a pretty simple job but he had to go and botch it.

reply

The entire political right was given the easiest layup I've ever seen and couldn't help but alienate most of the country.

reply

I would be really mad if I wasn't already super blackpilled about everything

reply
44 sats \ 1 reply \ @winteryeti 4h

He's never worked a real job in his life. Per his own multiple biographies, including those by Bill O'Rielly, he's had every job and opportunity handed to him from his father's work. Why would we expect him to actually work at something now?

reply

I mean, he'd actually be a better president if he'd work less at it.

(Though, to be honest, it's probably more his cabinet members and political allies that are being over zealous, and he just doesn't care enough to rein them in. So, yeah, guess he should work at it more.)

reply

actually it's not a simple job when paid agitators are interfering and threatening and doxing law enforcement

reply