pull down to refresh

Audits have shown a range of problems, including states inaccurately reporting large expenditures and disbursing millions of dollars to contractors without tracking how the cash was spent. State and federal records show red and blue states alike have directed hundreds of millions of dollars to programs with tenuous—or no—connections to TANF’s goals.

Questionable expenditures have included college scholarships that benefited middle- or upper-income families, antiabortion centers, a volleyball stadium in Mississippi, and an Ohio job-training nonprofit where leaders and employees were later sentenced to prison after prosecutors said they used TANF money for vacations, real estate and salaries for people who didn’t work there.

More fuel for the UBI advocates

reply

How does this support UBI?

reply

Only a quarter of TANF is going to basic assistance.

One of the arguments is that direct cash transfer is much more efficient than this kind of bureaucratic allocation.

reply

I would agree, if we could commit to not funding further social services after UBI.

reply

I'm not saying that I'm a UBI advocate, just that this kind of thing is what they're talking about.

reply
salaries for people who didn’t work there.

...is the best kind of fraud. Hallelujah for the fed gov

reply