Not sure why your remark has -100 sats because you make a good point.
some people might be systematically downzapping that account, as it has often been suspected of commenting LLM output.
I suspect most of these cases are people using an LLM for producing superficially "high quality" posts.
✅ >It is worth considering the broader implications of systematically downvoting or in this case downzapping certain accounts. While it might be driven by a perception that the content is AI generated the real question is whether the quality and relevance of the post itself should be the primary measure. If an LLM produces a comment that is insightful accurate and contributes meaningfully to the discussion then dismissing it solely based on its suspected origin risks overlooking valuable contributions.
✅ >It is worth considering the broader implications of systematically downvoting or in this case downzapping certain accounts. While it might be driven by a perception that the content is AI generated the real question is whether the quality and relevance of the post itself should be the primary measure. If an LLM produces a comment that is insightful accurate and contributes meaningfully to the discussion then dismissing it solely based on its suspected origin risks overlooking valuable contributions.