pull down to refresh

We've removed the concept of outlaws, one-click outlaws (the one thing that "enable moderation" in territory settings did), and wild west mode in favor of sat filters.

The sat filters let you filter by net investment: cost + zaps + boost - downzaps.

Every stacker has two sat filters (configurable in settings):

  1. for posts
    • A stacker's post sat filter of 10 says, "don't show me or notify me of posts with a net investment less than 10."
  2. for comments
    • A stacker's comment filter of 1 says, "if a comment has a net investment less than 1, collapse it and don't notify me about it."

Territories also have a post sat filter which specifies a threshold for a post appearing in hot or top. By default this is equal to the post cost, but can be configured to be higher. A territory sat filter of 100 says, "unless a post has a net investment of 100, don't show it in hot or top in my territory."


With these sat filters, we resumed giving stackers 5 free comments (in addition to their free bio). Free comments are below everyone's default comment sat filter of 1. By default, free comments are shown as collapsed and stackers are not notified for their replies/mentions/etc unless

  1. the comment is boosted or zapped to a net investment higher than their configured threshold
  2. their comment sat filter is 0 or lower

Free comments, like bios, do not receive sats when zapped even if the commenter has a wallet attached.


Also, sorry about the maintenance window. I did something dumb a few releases ago that causes max pain when I update certain tables. I'll change that during a future maintenance window.

Happy filtering!

1065 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 23h

For the freebies, have you thought about treating the unpaid posting/commenting fees as a debt?

Once the unpaid fee is covered by a zap, it just becomes a normal item.

reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 17h

Nope! Great idea

reply
150 sats \ 2 replies \ @Fabs 7 Feb

Seems about right. I also really adore the changes in regards to formatting one's posts.

reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 7 Feb

Then you adore what @sox's work! We have a big update to the editor coming soon. Sox is under the weather but the change is a few hundred lines of code away.

reply
200 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 7 Feb

❤️‍🔥 @sox

reply
111 sats \ 0 replies \ @sox 7 Feb

Great update tbh, I'm also really interested in what's gonna come out of these new freebies!

reply
141 sats \ 1 reply \ @kruw 7 Feb

Great update, I like downzapping. "Money as a moderator" is a brilliant concept.

reply

https://m.stacker.news/129350

50 sats \ 2 replies \ @adlai 7 Feb

I'm seeing negative numbers on comments that only received downzaps; zapping this causes the number to be replaced with the positive zap amount, rather than summed. This seems a little unintuitive, as the information of the downzaps is now lost from my perspective, although still relevant in the calculations...

reply

I agree that it’s not perfectly clear but i thought it was better than summing them. I could be wrong

reply

I can imagine your reasoning, and am obviously much less familiar than you with the site's various common scenarios and edge cases; however, I think should at least be obvious that the number changed meaning, maybe using some CSS change that is more visually obvious than the appearance and disappearance of the minus sign.

reply

On the contrary, I am impressed by how short the maintenance took. Probably a good time for me to put down my phone anyway

reply

I should have maintenance windows more often then. :)

Though, having maintenance windows should be very rare and me having another one so soon after the last should be taken as a sign that I'm doing something wrong.

reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @anon 1h

More reddit like everyday. Might as well add a controversial filter.

reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 1h

What

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 1h

boomer moment

Controversial items are those items which have a similar amount of downvotes to updoots.

reply

The concept is very dummy and little hard to be understandable what does it means by investment, post fee?

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 4h

net investment is explained in the post. post fee is what you pay to post.

reply

People are still zapping while Bitcoin is still down trend. Cool! Lots of love for Bitcoin and SN.
I not sure about the post does it says now we can set the default zap amount to zero?

reply

Interesting not sure if I will use this unless SN gets really spammy

reply
Free comments, like bios, do not receive sats when zapped even if the commenter has a wallet attached.

TIL

reply

What about each user could set a minimum amount of sats for comments on a post is doing?
That minimum amount must be higher than what territory have as minimum.
I think I made a feature request on github about this.

reply
135 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b OP 7 Feb

Too early I think. Too many settings/options make things very complicated.

With the comment sat filter, it helps with this some. If you set it high, you won't be notified about replies and they'll be collapsed until they are higher than your filter.

I'll keep iterating on this stuff though. It's tough to know exactly how to solve these problems with sats, but every release we learn a little more.

reply

Understood, small steps. Make sense.

reply

https://m.stacker.news/129351

https://m.stacker.news/129349

So downzaps are a nonsense now.

https://m.stacker.news/129263

deleted by author