pull down to refresh
They werent, thats my mistake - I added a graph from The Economist that had nothing to do with the WSJ/Dickens article other than illustrate income distribution of famous literary characters (in that case Austen)... And that's where 1798 came in
They werent, thats my mistake - I added a graph from The Economist that had nothing to do with the WSJ/Dickens article other than illustrate income distribution of famous literary characters (in that case Austen)... And that's where 1798 came in