pull down to refresh

Gloria has a CS degree from Berkeley, had solid programming experience, and was the president of Blockchain at Berkeley. A little while before she graduated, she was approached by some Bitcoin Core contributors whether she’d be interested in contributing. She had never looked at Bitcoin, but was hooked the moment she started trying out Bitcoin Core and looked at the code base. (Check out Stephan Livera’s #216 from 2020 to listen to the story.)

In the following years, she contributed immensely to Bitcoin Core, Optech, protocol development, and PR Review Club as well as giving a number of solid talks and podcasts. See e.g., https://x.com/bitcoinbrink/status/1875514461559386632.

The popular take among her detractors is that she’s DEI or even less charitable but more sexist/misogynist theories.

some territories are moderated

This confirms many of the worst suspicions

a CS degree from Berkeley

This type of credentialism is a liability rather than an asset, this "achievement" signifies proclivities toward group-think and hypersocialism over first-principles and exceptionalism

president of Blockchain at Berkeley ... had never looked at Bitcoin

Reddest of red flags, greatness comes from curiosity

was approached by some Bitcoin Core contributors

NGO operatives

was hooked the moment she started

The promise of an NGO paycheck will "hook" a lot of people on a lot of things.

The fact she never looked at it while being a Berkley CS Degree and leading a Blockchain group is horrible optics. Horrible.

The popular take among her detractors is that she’s DEI or even less charitable but more sexist/misogynist theories.

I mentioned the shit-tier griefing that comes with the territory and don't excuse it, but also the proactive white-knighting almost seems to run cover for the real issue, that NGO's are seemingly up to no good.

reply