NOT Liquid, not Spark, not Ark, not any other bullshit.
Just over Lightning Network, as it supposed to be.
pull down to refresh
related posts
pull down to refresh
NOT Liquid, not Spark, not Ark, not any other bullshit.
Just over Lightning Network, as it supposed to be.
Just over Lightning Network, as it supposed to be.
Not using CC shitcoins.
But @DarthCoin refuses to attach a LN wallet to Stacker News and so he is boycotting the use of sats and supporting CC shitcoins.
If we do not use the LN it will not gorw and develop stronger.
@DarthCoin says he uses CCs because they work 100% of the time rather than sats which occasionally fail.
@DarthCoin claims to be living on the bitcoin standard yet here on SNs he prefers to use CC shitcoins because they are so reliable.
What a Fucking Hypocrit.
is not my title
@DarthCoin refuses to attach a LN wallet to Stacker News and so @DarthCoin is boycotting the use of sats and supporting a shitcoin.
If we do not use the LN it will not grow and develop stronger.
@Darthcoin says he uses CCs because they work 100% of the time rather than sats which occasionally fail.
@DarthCoin claims to be living on the bitcoin standard yet here on SNs he prefers to use CC shitcoins because they are so reliable.
What a Fucking Hypocrit.
Do we actually know... that Darth doesn't ever pay with Lightning on SN?
Like I explained myself, I haven't 'attached a wallet' but pay via QR code and have for a while actually.
You are right, he could use LN via QR code but his stated position is that he prefers CCs because they are 100% reliable.
He is publicly promoting and endorsing using CC shitcoins as superior to sats because 'CCs never fail'
#1425329
Paying via QR code for what valid reason?
You think it is more secure?
What is the risk in using an attached wallet that has a low balance and enables easy and convenient zapping?
By using an attached wallet I am supporting both that wallet via fees and the LN via fees.
By using QR code you are making it less convenient to zap and concealing your use of LN.
I thought one of the driving ideas behind SNs was to build a sats based social network and I wear the gun and horse with pride and in defiance of the state regulators who threatened to close down/prosecute SNs on the pretext of money transmission.
I do not understand any need or merit in concealing our use of LN or making it less convenient by using QR code.
For @DarthCoin or any serious Bitcoiner who claims to be serious about the need to build and develop the LN I only see cowardice, sloth and hypocrisy where they do not attach LN wallet.
I think... you should relax a little, OK?
Also look at the big picture.
You can see many of my posts that actively advocate for Lightning adoption, I have tested it and although a little buggy it works.
@DarthCoin for all his faults has spent years writing guides on Lightning and how to use Lightning wallets - his guides make Lightning easier to use, OK?
Everyone here should be using Lightning, and one day we all will be using it but right now frankly whether we tip in sats or not...
There are a lot of other things going on in the world. Stacker News is still very small in the big scheme of things.
I am tired of Bitcoiners who are all talk and no walk.
'Oh its too hard to use LN...I will use sats because its easier.'
LN will only grow stronger if we use it and support it.
Everytime I zap post or comment I support the network with fees paid.
Big mouthed Hypocrits like @DarthCoin do not.
I think you should address the issues raised rather than seeking to attack or undermine the messenger.
Yes @DarthCoin has written a lot about LN, but he is doing nothing about actually using it here on this platform where he spouts all his BTC Maxi self claims of 'living on the bitcoin standard'.
He has considerable status and many look up to him and the image he has projected...and so him boycotting the use of the LN BTC P2P system that has been built on here is a serious issue...some are following that example like sheep degrading and undermining the entire project.
SNs has been built in order to enable LN sats denominated P2P V4V community and @Darthcoin is openly boycotting participation in that project.
It is a vast and gross hypocrisy.
You leap to his defense like some minor public service minion desperate to impress his alleged superiors. You are not a free thinking Bitcoiner but a group think cuck apologist desperate to conform and kowtowing to the bully hypocrit @DarthCoin.
Stacker news is still very small but as the only social media platform I can zap P2P sats and enjoy numerous viewpoints and news it is important to me and I resent big mouthed and blatant hypocrits like @DarthCoin and his sock puppet minions degrading its integrity.
LOL OK I understand where you are coming from.
Let me just say this though... if this is how you feel about the folks on Stacker News...
How do you feel about the real sock-puppets on Twitter? Does Twitter use any Lightning? No I don't think so.
One day eventually Lightning will be everywhere on the internet.
See my first post from August 2024, it wasn't that long ago... but it feels like a lifetime with how much I've learned. Just think of where we'll be in 5 - 10 years.
I used to think it was a big deal when my monthly territory rent went through.
Remember my old post about LN analogy with water pipes?
#552822
It's exactly that: if between 2 peers there are enough large pipes, it doesn't have to be a problem to push x amount of water from one side to another. Is all about how big are the pipes.
I remember
@DarthCoin refuses to attach a LN wallet to Stacker News and so he is boycotting the use of sats and supporting a shitcoin.
If we do not use the LN it will not grow and develop stronger.
@Dartcoin says he uses CCs because they work 100% of the time rather than sats which occasionally fail.
@DarthCoin claims to be living on the bitcoin standard yet here on SNs he prefers to use CC shitcoins because they are so reliable.
What a Fucking Hypocrit.
👏👏👏 love to see it
Love to see this
Too many people with LDS nowadays
Organic lightning 💪
simple as it is
11.3 BTC