pull down to refresh

So Saylor's dream's of a 30% cagr may be in for a slight upset 🫣

Yes and I cringe every-time I see someone post that number, its cherry picking and "zooming out" with no practical basis for engineering financial products such as he has.

If we want to cherry pick and zoom out we can also say its only 18% from 2017 to today. That's higher than he's paying on STRC, but still not a lot of margin when you consider his execution prices are terrible, theta risk, and probably other things I can't even think of.

The emission schedule favors higher, capital markets access favors higher, but at the same time the contrarian asymmetry is lower, fiscal regime change favors lower, and ownership concentration creates a new risk on-par with policy risk.

We topped on apathy not exuberance, so when you adjust for that, this bear market is a major channel breakdown of all prior assumptions.

I'm obviously still bullish long term, but we deserve better bull narratives than I'm seeing.

Saylor is a CIA-affiliated spook HQ'd minutes away in Northern Virginia, he's obviously been tapped on the shoulder to play a role and can't tell us exactly what he knows, but neither the Saylor detractors nor the Saylor worshippers are using all the available information.

reply
Saylor is a CIA-affiliated spook HQ'd minutes away in Northern Virginia, he's obviously been tapped on the shoulder to play a role and can't tell us exactly what he knows,

THAT is juicy, oh yes. Tell us more

reply

Long time "contractor" from publicly available information

Anyone who's been in any intelligence agency rabbit holes knows contractors and front orgs are used for much more than is publicly known.

They practically share a campus

Everything he (and Bitcoin generally) have done wrt access to capital markets takes blocking and tackling at the highest levels to achieve. Game theory may account for some of it sure, but at the same time, there are counter-forces for whom this game-theory is a threat to their incumbency and would crush it at all costs.

One can say there are no conspiracy theories, but to be consistent in saying that you must also conclude there are no coincidences. If Federal intelligence contracts and sharing a campus with the CIA is a coincidence it's also a conspiracy.

reply