Struggling with the incentive to continue deep diving on any particular AI.
Moltbot for example - how long will it last before it's replaced by the next thing?
Eventually (probably sooner than later) everyone won't need to be "prompt masters." We're still in the MS DOS days of AI.
And I'm OK with replying to emails and making reservations myself without outsourcing it to a fallible, placating technology. It's really not that hard or time intensive.
Going forward from here there is a premium on human authenticity.
I will continue to keep up with the rapidly changing AI landscape, but don't see the value in running down every single rabbit hole.
How are you dealing with it?
Following concepts, not specific LLMs. The models are just the implementation, as are the tools.
What's interesting about clawdbot is that it is built with Skills, not MCP. This is something we saw coming for a few months now and it gives Anthropic a big moat.
Is it me or does Anthropic seem to be gaining steam as the frontrunner for AI agents
Not just
Agents, but in general,Actions. Right now, it looks like they've spent their 2025 R&D money well.idk, Gemini 3 really closed the gap and Grok is in the mix. They've been the frontrunner, but seems to be trending less so than moreso.
Coincidence that neither are using custom chips instead of Nvidia GPU's for training?
I think that both Gemini (as a generic chat & image model, with phone integration) and Grok (as a search & ELI5 model) beat GPT and Claude 9 out of 10 times. Google did a great job with Gemini 3 (it's much better for normies than GPT 5.x) and honestly Grok 4.1 is my go-to as a search engine stand-in right now.
Since May last year though, whenever I want to vibe code something, Claude (+
Codetooling) has been consistently improving and reducing the need for me to correct it (and beating the competition). I suspect that this is because Anthropic prioritizes optimization for tool calling, extensibility and self-checks, whereas both Grok and Gemini are a bit more generic. Gemini 3 has beaten Claude 4.5 Opus on some standalone coding questions I've thrown at it onarena.ai, but from a process perspective, I think that Anthropic has something going for them.fwiw, I like Anthropic the company about as little as I like what Google has become, but that doesn't mean that their product can't be good.