pull down to refresh

Thanks.

I’m not worried about blocksize or blockchain growth. When Segwit was activated, it was with the understanding that it was a blocksize increase that allowed blocks to be up to 4 MB.
The blockchain only grew by about 83.5 GB in 2025. That’s an average blocksize of about 1.57 MB (53,082 blocks in 2025).
For comparison, it grew by 88.7 GB in 2024 and 92 GB in 2023.

Blockchain size in bytes on Dec 31:

The UTXO set also shrank in count in 2025 (after growing significantly between 2023-04 and 2024-07):

TBH, a lot of the narratives seem pretty decoupled from what’s actually happening.

If you think a blocksize decrease or removing the segwit discount should be considered, why do you think that would be expected to lead to an improvement? And what improvements and other effects would you expect?

If you think a blocksize decrease or removing the segwit discount should be considered, why do you think that would be expected to lead to an improvement? And what improvements and other effects would you expect?

I know this question wasn't directed at me, but here are my thoughts anyway:

I think that the witness discount distorts incentives, since it makes inscriptions significantly cheaper compared to any other kind of transaction. Large inscriptions also lead to bigger blocks.

If the witness discount were removed, data embedding would probably shift to the less harmful OP_RETURN outputs, since this would then be the cheapest way.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Murch 2h

It would also reduce the blocksize and significantly reduce the transaction throughput, but blockspace demand right now is just a little less than blockspace production. So I would expect the feerates to explode again like they did in 2024 and 2017. While I’ve expected for a very long time that small payments would get priced out over time, such a move would probably make transactions very expensive immediately. What should then be the next move after that?

reply