pull down to refresh
Sure. However, intelligence has many branches with many purveyors of "soft disclosure". None of them are hitting on the cylinders that this work is. It might be that everyone decided to use it as a subconscious kind of script more than it is that intelligence is driving the narrative. I suspect much of what happens in America has more to do with the population becoming greedy and lazy than it does with an evil, small cadre controlling the world. If the people are energized, that kind of crap won't fly.
None of them are hitting on the cylinders that this work is.
Limited hangouts are limited by their nature.
In just the last few weeks I posted clips from The Diplomat, and the newer Jack Ryan show on things in the current news cycle.
These things aren't scripted and produced year ahead of actual news cycles by happenstance. Clancy's novels are more thematic, which allows them to hold up over decades.
If media can write and direct a script so can the highest level of the IC.
population becoming greedy and lazy than it does with an evil small cadre controlling the world
Both, the cabals use extortion, bribes, and blackmail against greedy/lazy people to control things.
If the people are energized
Only happens at the precipice, its always darkest before dawn.
There's also been decades of psyoping otherwise energized people to stay on the sidelines, evil is done by good people doing nothing.
These things aren't scripted and produced year ahead of actual news cycles by happenstance. Clancy's novels are more thematic, which allows them to hold up over decades.
What I'm saying is that after a thing happens, everyone calls it predictive programming or soft disclosure. Instead, I think it is more a kind of collective wish-fulfillment that people allow to play out by inattention. The ending of this work, for instance, so far hasn't happened. I wonder why that is?
They're about the landscape in which those things happen. The fiction illustrates the logical conclusion to those circumstances, so when intervention happens and that intervention is perhaps ugly it is in contrast to the alternative outcome in the fiction.
Leave the world behind, Civil War... two recent movies that show threats. With those threats in the public mind, intervention of those becomes more acceptable.
hmm. The ending of the EO is not what I'd call "pretty" but it is conclusive.
I have a different idea for why we don't see the ending like the book has but the tragedies only. It has to do more with human nature and what it has faith in.
I understand your points, though, about "priming" a population.
about "priming" a population.
Yea and I wouldn't even conclude these activities to be nefarious. People generally assume any state secrets to be nefarious inherently, but I think that's naive. Project Mockingbird, the Church Committee etc are just samples and associated with propaganda. A lot of that is CIA, which has a terrible record.
For every nefarious or scandal cover-up psyop, there's also a benign preparation of public acceptance for national security efforts (Top Gun re: Iran nuclear reactor bombing etc). Could paint that as MIL/DIA as juxtaposed to CIA.
If you haven't seen Sum of all Fears... watch it.
Note the song that gets played at the end.
Then go listen to what Trump played after his RNC acceptance speech, and a few times since.
I'm familiar with both. What do you think that means?
I'd spoil the movie for others to describe it here. Think about who's getting killed and how as that song plays. What did those people try to do?
That's pretty well established, much of his work is soft-disclosure of operational planning and classified anecdotes
It's also a nod to the fact that everything we see in politics and world events is scripted