pull down to refresh

202 sats \ 7 replies \ @optimism 6h \ on: Rethinking AI Sovereignty - WEF whitepaper AI builders

When the WEF's paper says sovereign, they mean sovereign states

When Satya says sovereign, he means sovereign corporations

I wonder though: who is at the WEF, defending that the ultimate sovereign is that of the individual?

write
preview
100 sats \ 5 replies \ @Car OP 5h

from my understanding the reframing they use are directed toward governing AI on government terms, aligned with national values while also not limiting strategic control & resilience

reply
102 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 5h

Yes, exactly. So all the different governments will govern the AIs of their subjects, which consolidates power into the hands of some 160 groups of overlords at the expense of the sovereignty of some 7 billion people that happen to not be overlords.

If I would actually consider myself a subject of a government, I would find this sort of alarming.

reply
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @Car OP 5h
If I would actually consider myself a subject of a government, I would find this sort of alarming.

If you are a smaller country absolutely, because they are advising state centricity by design

very likely if this plays out in the scenario they are advising

🔮 I could see a world where AI dependency "technologically" is spigot that is similar to what we have now with the FED, upstream plumbing becomes downstream leverage

reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 5h

While I read your crystal ball I was shouting "End the FED". Now you know how I really feel 😭😂

reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Car OP 5h

I have some more thoughts on this, will likely bring up on snl, also would like to get k00b take on this.

reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 5h

Looking forward.

reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 6h

That’s an easy one!

None

reply