pull down to refresh
The core thing is also it speaks of focusing on Safety and Empowering the person. It's speaking of them things being wrong and not trauma informed. The core is they are supposed to focus on Safety First. And didn't mean to come off defensive to you. Either way have witnessed the patterns in people and am documenting stuff with biblical standards.
I believe you. and I think we should support ourselves to the best outcomes possible
After 36 years of going through things it brought me into deep mediations and when that happened it came out with a understanding of my own internal world. And been untangling from a lot of things. As have been untangling from years of wounds. I fell into 7 years of deep meditations and have issues with social skills on the wounds and wounding after coming out from a space of learned helplessness, I started reviewing my own life and don't take anything in defensively but have witnessed these patterns in my own life with systems that's called themselves helpful and as have been doing the work I learned how to see the places that was fragmented throughout my own life story where we wasn't taught our emotions and the ways to understand their meanings. Going into the wounded space I'd say go into it with more clear eyes 💗 because when we go back to a tiny space and understand our emotions along with these patterns it's not about judging the patterns are our own emotions it's about seeing where the fragments was left in the story along with witnessing the patterns. And having compassion for ourselves in the in the journey and didn't mean to come off defensive because the pattern still stands and I don't accept the projection of defensiveness.
I'm fully here for compassion, integration, and healing.
nice to hear from a real human.
I doubt you play chess, so a closing remark like "your move" is insulting.
if you have years of wounding, how will you remove that? I recommend getting in touch with the memories which raise your defenses, and just feeling them.
my action, subsequent to reading the post, was to ping some trauma-informed psychotherapists in my close social network, to ask about what they notice in the assertion: the compassionate tegulator is evil.
I'm not sure the compassionate regulator is a real thing, but I don't know, by virtue of my circumstance. I'm not in close touch with professional therapeutic practice. neither am I familiar with how their work is done.
I noticed the post sounds to have come from a robot, and I know enough to know they (like natural human brains) tend to hallucinate, but (unlike natural human brains) also tend to do so with what seems like an authoritative tone.
so, "my move" is to name the slop, challenge the assertion, and learn from the outcome.
good luck