it's easy to say that you don't want to lose your block rewards. that's what BIP110 is banking on. but what if the BIP100 miners have a dip in hash rate and two blocks are mined that aren't BIP100 compliant? are BIP100 miners going to work at a two block deficit, hoping that they catch up? or are they just going to "start over from here"?
this can go on forever, and the fees on those non BIP100 transactions are going to start getting real fat. what if someone puts two non BIP100 transactions that can't be mined in the same block, each with a 1BTC reward? think that line will hold?
RDTS node runners can’t change the activation mechanism in their software without recompiling, so no, they can’t decide to accept a few invalid blocks after activation to start over at a higher height.
it's easy to say that you don't want to lose your block rewards. that's what BIP110 is banking on. but what if the BIP100 miners have a dip in hash rate and two blocks are mined that aren't BIP100 compliant? are BIP100 miners going to work at a two block deficit, hoping that they catch up? or are they just going to "start over from here"?
this can go on forever, and the fees on those non BIP100 transactions are going to start getting real fat. what if someone puts two non BIP100 transactions that can't be mined in the same block, each with a 1BTC reward? think that line will hold?
hah