pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @DarthCoin 16 Jan \ on: [OG Post] A Mathematical Theory of Payment Channel Networks lightning

I think the right name is "payment channels" and not "lightning channels".
We should use to say it like that.

write
preview
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 16 Jan

A more accurate name would be "LN payment channels" 🤠

reply
31 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 16 Jan

No, are bitcoin payment channels. Bitcoin need a payment channel, LN doesn't "need" it in ittself.
payment Ln channels sounds like something else than bitcoin.

Without LN, bitcoin will be dead.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 16 Jan

@DarthCoin refuses to attach btc capable LN wallets to his SNs account.

He claims to live on the BTC Standard but cannot even bother using it here on SNs.

@DarthCoin is the supreme BTC Maxi hypocrit.

Do not zap arsemilking parasites like @DarthCoin who pretend to be bitcoiners but who deliberately boycott SNs BTC LN circular economy...

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 16 Jan

You know what, Darth? Everybody else has been calling them payment channels but now that YOU have said that we should call them payment channels, it's a good idea.

And if that's your only takeaway from this paper, I'd consider that a success.

reply