I wrote several times about it here on SN...
Is history, forget it, it was a nice test.

> So no, Mutiny wasn't a total self custody and most of users were clueless about this aspect, blinded by intense shills from podcasters

Here comes Darth again. Thanks for clearing that up

hasherstacker

You are wrong in your assumption that Mutiny was  easy to self custody.

Seems that you didn't played enough with it to see that user whole communication was done through a domain THAT YOU DO NOT CONTROL IT.

So no, Mutiny wasn't a total self custody and most of users were clueless about this aspect, blinded by intense shills from podcasters.

And no, you still have many other wallet apps.

Choose wisely your wallets.... based on your knowledge and use cases, not because some podcaster told you to use x app.

bitcoin

bitcoin_beginners

lightning

Why there's little to no replacement at all

You are wrong in your assumption that Mutiny was  easy to self custody.
It depends on running your own servers.
Seems that you didn't played enough with it to see that user whole communication was done through a domain THAT YOU DO NOT CONTROL IT.

So no, Mutiny wasn't a total self custody and most of users were clueless about this aspect, blinded by intense shills from podcasters.

And no, you still have many other wallet apps.
Mutiny model wasn't sustainable.

Choose wisely your wallets.... based on your knowledge and use cases, not because some podcaster told you to use x app.

![](https://m.stacker.news/126276)