pull down to refresh

102 sats \ 2 replies \ @SimpleStacker 4h \ on: Tether Fun Unelievable Details - Part IV bitcoin

Should we call these Funbelievable Details?

write
preview
67 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 4h

Oh, that is pretty good. But then I lose the acronym. Might be worth it though.

reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 4h

On the downside, you lose the acronym

On the upside, you create some mischievous ambiguity: fun believable details, or fun unbelievable details?

reply