pull down to refresh

The security implications have been discussed for decades, we've had military there since at least WW2

Truman tried to buy it outright in 46

Greenland defense agreement codified in 51

Upgraded in 2004 under missile shield initiative

More meetings with Denmark by Clinton as Obama Sec of State in 2010-2013

Trump's been consistent since pre-V1

The pussy-footing hasn't been working, Russian subs loose in the North Atlantic and China mining it...

So now the IC/defense media apparatus has been spelling it out pretty clearly:

view on x.com

Ice breaker passage now more viable... trade routes.

Minerals isn't even that valuable to the US, they're available in lots of places... refining is the real bottleneck.

TDS destroyed again.

reply

NATO: Tell Denmark to get them out of here, NOW! Two dogsleds won’t do it! Only the USA can!!!

Danish intel warned last year about Russian and Chinese military goals toward Greenland and Arctic (https://justthenews.com/government/security/danish-intel-warned-about-russian-and-chinese-military-ambitions-toward/)

reply

I really hope this is the planned dismantling of NATO

reply
refining is the real bottleneck

China controls 90 percent of this step: refining and converting to metallic compound

almost all of the rare earth refining experts are Chinese, some are working or studying at American universities

TDS destroyed again.
kaboom
reply

Darn it JS with your factually correct knowledge 😇

reply

Bitcoin and NatSec are inextricably part of one another, possibly the most exciting time to be alive

reply

Yeah, I was going to comment that corrupt insidery stuff can just as easily flow the other direction.

These billionaires catch wind of the annexation plans early and invest accordingly.

reply