pull down to refresh
So you refuse to use a custodial wallet like coinos that makes zapping with sats easy and very cheap while supporting coinos team development and liquidity?
LN is always going to come with some compromises on L1 but the aim is to get and grow MoE capability and using sats instead of CCs on SNs is a way of supporting the development of LN.
Currently it is clear self custody wallets are difficult to use on SNs but as soon as they can then you can switch to them, but until then lets support the whole LN development process by using the wallets that can be used within our technical abilities.
If I can use coinos I am sure you can too!
I love the idea that the (very minimal) fees I pay coinos are going toward developing both coinos and LN strength and liquidity.
If we wait for perfection we may never achieve it- let's work with what we have and work toward supporting constant improvement by using LN where and when and how we can.
Coinos is a bank and a very bad one because it got rugged. I do not use banks.
You can argue all you want but it's not going to work. You always whine about principles. My principles are: fuck banks, fuck governments, and fuck anyone that tries to tell someone else what they should do.
I just do what I want. If you have a problem with that, do a PR on https://github.com/stackernews/stacker.news and remove CCs. Good luck.
I'm sorry but we also had this discussion before. My SN spends (despite not having been outside of top10 spenders any week for almost a year now) are insignificant compared to my LN and on-chain spends. It's simply not enough value to justify the additional security needed as long as there are no good wallets that are non-custodial and support NWC.
I had hopes for Zeus 0.12 but it needs more love. I still want to test Justin's setup though, but I need to do a lot of security work for it. It will come, but I cannot guarantee that it will be a permanent solution; that depends on how well it works for me, and me alone.