Mass deportations in 2025 did lower U.S. rents, but only by a few dollars, while gutting the very workforce needed to build affordable housing.
Immigration alone doesn’t drive rent inflation, but the 2025 deportation wave exposed how housing markets depend on immigrants both to rent and to build.
What everyone got wrongWhat everyone got wrong
When the second Trump administration began mass deportations in early 2025, many assumed rents would finally drop. They did, barely. National median rent fell just 1.3% by year-end, the first annual dip in over a decade. But that sliver of relief came at enormous cost: construction labor vanished, projects stalled, and long-term housing supply shrank.
The mechanism that matteredThe mechanism that mattered
Immigrants aren’t just tenants. They’re the backbone of the construction trades. Roughly one in four U.S. construction workers was foreign-born before the crackdown. Deporting even a fraction created a double shock:
- Demand shock: 1 million fewer renters means some empty apartments and slight price relief.
- Supply shock: Losing builders and repair crews drives future rents back up.
As economist Mike Konczal put it, even removing a million renters only saves the average tenant $4.40 a month, while choking off the labor that adds new housing.
The regional storyThe regional story
Sun Belt metros like Austin and Phoenix saw rents plunge 5–7% as vacancies hit record highs. But coastal cities like New York and San Francisco, where building is hardest, still saw rents rise. Immigrant-heavy Houston, by contrast, became a case study in hollowing out: ICE raids emptied entire complexes once full of Central American families, leaving “rows of empty units” and stalled construction permits.
The bottom lineThe bottom line
Mass deportations didn’t solve affordability; they exposed America’s dependence on immigrant labor to keep housing livable. You can shrink demand by fear, but you can’t build homes without hands.
If the goal is affordable rent, the lever isn’t who leaves. It’s what gets built.
If population decline gives us temporary rent relief, but labor loss drives prices up again, what’s the real lever policymakers should pull: immigration limits or construction expansion?
I agree with the general idea, but there haven't been enough deportations to cause that large of a demand side effect. The mechanism probably has to do with people leaving the US and/or not moving into the US.
SourcesSources
Pew — Key findings about U.S. immigrants
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/08/21/key-findings-about-us-immigrants/
(Baseline immigrant population trends used in the report.)
Apartment List — National Rent Report / national rent data
https://www.apartmentlist.com/research/national-rent-data
(Tracks rents, vacancy, and leasing time metrics cited.)
Calculated Risk (Bill McBride) — Asking Rents Decline Year-over-year
https://calculatedrisk.substack.com/p/asking-rents-decline-year-over-year
(Industry-style read on rent softening + drivers, cited in report.)
Mike Konczal — “Mass Deportation Will Save Renters Less Than $5 a Month”
https://newsletter.mikekonczal.com/p/mass-deportation-will-save-renters
(Back-of-envelope scale check for rent impact from demand removal.)
NAR — Multifamily advertised rents drop regionally
https://www.nar.realtor/commercial/create/multifamily-advertised-rents-drop-regionally
(Regional dispersion / rent softness context.)
Dallas Fed — Immigration crackdown contributing to weak Texas job growth
https://www.dallasfed.org/research/swe/2025/swe2515
(Example of broader economic drag channel discussed in report.)
Urban Institute — “Mass Deportations Would Worsen Our Housing Crisis”
https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/mass-deportations-would-worsen-our-housing-crisis
(Construction labor force + supply-side warning; complements demand-side story.)