https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000010631041/minneapolis-ice-shooting-video.html?smid=url-share
TL;DR:
The administration says the ICE agent fired “defensive shots” because Renee Good was about to run him over. But a multi-angle video analysis argues the opposite: the SUV appears to reverse and then turn away, while the shooter is off to the side (left of the vehicle), not in its path, and he keeps firing as the car passes.
After the SUV crashes into a parked car, the analysis says agents don’t immediately render aid, block bystanders (including a doctor) from helping, and some agents leave the scene, which the piece frames as potentially compromising/altering the crime scene.
Good’s last words to Ross: “That’s fine dude, I’m not mad at you.”
Ross after shooting and killing her seconds later: “Fuckin’ bitch.”
Video: Alpha News via X (@AlphaNews)
https://bsky.app/profile/ryangrim.bsky.social/post/3mbzeooopdc2t
If “self-defense” is the claim, the standard is necessity + proportionality. Watch the hands: Bellingcat’s frame-by-frame suggests the shooter keeps a phone in his left hand through the approach/draw/shots, and the camera app appears visible shortly after. That’s a real, testable detail.
https://skywriter.blue/pages/did:plc:sb54dpdfefflykmf5bcfvr7t/post/3mbwmvgypqc2x
Imminent ramming’ but he’s multitasking with the camera app. Sure.