pull down to refresh

I get that. I guess a different way to phrase it would be "Why were the training materials so biased towards use of this thing that it immediately became a signal of AI creation?"

69 sats \ 1 reply \ @adlai 8 Jan

Honestly, I don't think it's a bad thing, and if I were employed in one of the providers, I would be lobbying at any opportunity to maintain the human-obvious fingerprint of LLM output... it's like finding a catchy name for a new soft drink that works well within the music of the local dialect, although is obviously a foreign word. It advertises itself.

reply

I don't really care one way or the other. I just find these methodological issues interesting.

reply