pull down to refresh
If someone can argue coherently as to why it's wrong, I will change my mind. I have only heard incoherent FUD up until now.
Incoherent FUD like this proposed guide?
Social consensus is overwhelmingly in favor of rejecting data storage as a use case, and BIP-110 is the best way to accomplish this. If someone finds a better way, I will withdraw BIP-110. Failing that, there is absolutely no reason to oppose BIP-110.
Social consensus is overwhelmingly in favor.
Measured how?
Do you think that Bitcoin should officially support the arbitrary data storage use case?
No, but that is because there is no official.
I have not met a single non-troll who thinks that Bitcoin should officially support the data storage use case. That seems "official" enough for me.
Do you think that the Bitcoin consensus rules should be restricted to remove abuse?
This is not the motivation of BIP-110. Since you just said that you don't want Bitcoin to officially support the data storage use case, you should support BIP-110 as you are 100% in alignment with its goals, and there is no better proposal on the table to achieve said goals.
Answer the question
By talking to Bitcoiners and noting that no one wants Bitcoin to officially support the data storage use case.
Do you want Bitcoin to officially support arbitrary data storage?
So you have no objective measurement other than the people you talk to.
You do know that just repeating this claim like a mantra doesn’t actually make it so, right?