pull down to refresh
Narrative was seeded in Trump v1, these things are gamed out well in advance, so I doubt it's an imminent threat but rather a soft-disclosure of what's already been decided
If NATO breaks down over Greenland then that was always the plan, ex-NATO we can let Russia set up its perimeter in Eastern Europe without a significant (expensive) confrontation that doesn't benefit the US
At the same time, VZ gives China a pretext to simply use clandestine ops to out the Taiwan separatists without another expensive defense of what's little more than a CIA field office
WW3 avoided, US stays cozy in its freshly fortified hemisphere.
Look at who's saying it'll burn, the people that are wrong about everything... Panicans, Europoors, and the administrative deep state
WW3 wouldn't be a better alternative for Eastern Europe or Taiwan
Is the EU really benefiting eastern europe? Is pouring money into Taiwan's defense benefiting anyone? Does Poland really want total war over the largely uninhabited Suwalki gap?
Taiwan specifically doesn't add up, first thing people bring up is chips... which we've already been hedging for a decade... their share is going down not up, chips aren't a natural resource, the machines that make them can be moved/replicated
Only thing that gives me pause on Taiwan is the island chain narrative wrt naval projection, but Taiwan is still otherwise surrounded by protectorates like Phillipines, SK, and Japan... I don't think it's as big of an issue as the globalists make it sound
Oh I'm not saying that WW3 is the better alternative. Not at all. If I look at most analysts they're basically tagging this all as opportunistic. I'd love to believe that it's that simple but I feel that it would be kind of negligent to not look for alternative explanations.
The problem with your explanation is that it could be reasonable from a US perspective. It's also very, very cold. I'm not convinced that a lasting majority of Americans will feel that way for a century, or even does so now.
Well, we could wish Russia and China didn't feel the need to expand their security perimeter... Maybe they don't, and we're being lied to by them and our own...
But taken at face value, what are the options? Seems it's either negotiation or WW3
I don't see negotiation as cold, but rather the most caring thing... but I'm also a realist. The general public virtue signals and has been brainwashed for decades to believe in bogeymen and sacrifice blood and treasure for the globalists
You raise a good point though in that the public has to be un-brainwashed to avoid WW3... How do we do that?
I actually think that operation is underway.
Psyop WW3. Scare people awake. Show them what the globalists nearly brought them to ... Bring them to the precipice, power outages, tactical nuclear strikes (controlled, low impact), cut undersea cables taking offline the Internet, emergency broadcast system... Controlled hysteria... All a cooperatively designed through back channels as part of the negotiations.
They paint Trump as a Russian collaborator and have since day one, Trump calls Xi his friend.
The most likely scenario is they're all working together to avoid WW3 with consideration for optics. WW3 = WWE
Good question. I have.been thinking about that a lot. I have seen theories that the repo activity, (not) QE, and the out of control precious metals prices might indicate that banks are in trouble, but who knows?
I wonder which threat the public doesn't know about that got them so riled up that all this has to happen right now.