pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @AGORA 3 Jan \ parent \ on: Branta's Approach To Bitcoin Payment Address Verification: Triangulated Security AGORA
No intermediary !

Fair enough, noted. What brought you back to this post nearly two months after it was shared?

write
preview
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 3 Jan
you back to this post nearly two months after it was shared?

I always do this, zaping or commenting on old posts, if is necessary.
Stackers are used here to be first to zap to get more daily rewards. I am not that kind of user... I like to zap in the shadow...

reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 3 Jan

Because Branta deleted the original post, where I said my words. RED FLAG again. They want only clueless followers, not critical thinking.

reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @AGORA 3 Jan

ahaha, truth is painful. Are you referring to this #1279723 or something else somewhere else?

reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 3 Jan

Yes that one

reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @AGORA 3 Jan

They did note it at the beginning of this posts:

Disclosure: An earlier version of this post was published two days ago. It was withdrawn for revisions to improve clarity and accuracy.

Anyhow, it still a redflag, even if Branta mention that All addresses are purged after a TTL (usually 1 hour, sometimes 1 day - receiver decides.) there's no certainty data is deleted once provided by merchants and vendors. For this reason we should be careful to who we provide such information.

That guy was trusting that woman too. Trust is not enough and the only thing guiding us are the morals and ethos of bitcoin. We must keep those in mind.

reply