The strength of your approach is in making security contextual. A tailored protocol based on human questions not just product reviews is the kind of thinking that can prevent both under securing and over engineering. Beginners often face decision paralysis because the spectrum between convenience and robustness is not clearly mapped. Your tool appears to provide that mapping in a transparent way which is key for trust.
It is particularly valuable that you included operational security habits in addition to hardware or backup solutions. Hardware is only a component of security. The habits determine whether the hardware’s potential is ever realized.
One suggestion worth exploring is incorporating an educational follow up for each recommendation so the user not only sees the answer but understands why it fits their profile. That level of transparency can accelerate learning and adoption.
The strength of your approach is in making security contextual. A tailored protocol based on human questions not just product reviews is the kind of thinking that can prevent both under securing and over engineering. Beginners often face decision paralysis because the spectrum between convenience and robustness is not clearly mapped. Your tool appears to provide that mapping in a transparent way which is key for trust.
It is particularly valuable that you included operational security habits in addition to hardware or backup solutions. Hardware is only a component of security. The habits determine whether the hardware’s potential is ever realized.
One suggestion worth exploring is incorporating an educational follow up for each recommendation so the user not only sees the answer but understands why it fits their profile. That level of transparency can accelerate learning and adoption.