pull down to refresh
Didn't the Templars use to lend out money?
reply
I'm not as sure about that. I know they provided banking services which was necessitated by the vast movement of people and resources during the crusades, but I don't know if they charged interest.
reply
They probably just charged for the service, which sounds fair. I know they lent a ton of gold to the French King, but then he took down the Templars, total move just to get out of paying them back.
reply
The prohibition against usury in the Bible was generally against charging interest to the poor and to fellow Jews. Just a few examples:
Moreover, Jesus speaks positively of those who invested their money wisely in the parable of talents, and to the one who didn't invest, explicitly said, "You ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and at my coming I should have received what was my own with interest." Now, the parable is indeed a metaphor for things beyond money, but it's unlikely he would have spoken positively of investing with interest if it was absolutely forbidden.
Both Catholic and Protestant traditions also understand usury to mean taking advantage of those in need (which I think is consistent with the Old Testament prohibitions), rather than charging interest on a loan which is intended as a mutually beneficial commercial endeavor.