pull down to refresh
You raise good.points, but I think the send wallet settings are browser based and more susceptible to getting disconnected. I know it will happen to me if I clear my browser cache.
Ah, yeah it's definitely a permissions thing then. As always, security requires inconveniences. I wouldn't mind SN just going back to custodial wallets. We can't get a de minimis exemption to bitcoin transactions soon enough.
I don't know. I really love the idea of attached wallets here. We are genuinely using the lightning network, IMO, though I know people disagree with me. Going back to custodial wallets would be disappointing.
IMO at the amounts and the transaction rates we're dealing with, it really just makes more sense. People would still be using lightning to deposit and withdraw real sats to their SN account.
The amounts are small, but trustlessness should count for something, no?
It actually doesn't make sense to me that send wallets take more work to attach.
Receiving requires always-on. Sending doesn't. Also, receiving requires inbound liquidity. Sending doesn't.
So, yeah, I don't understand why a sending wallet should be considered more difficult to attach; other than at first there were some bugs regarding permission levels, iirc.