pull down to refresh
reply
But are they assmilkers if SN allows this to happen? If they pay CCs to post and they are able to receive sat zaps then it make sense people would do this on mass. Especially those who are looking more to extract than to contribute.
It’s clear SN celebrates stackers more than zappers the way the incentives are celebrated.
reply
It’s clear SN celebrates stackers more than zappers the way the incentives are celebrated.
Exactly. I think SN needs it but this is kind of a dilemma in itself. SN may correct it in future though by abolishing CCs once it's large enough in stackers count. However I also feel that the chances for the opposite - for CCs to hold on SN — are higher than the Sats.
reply
reply
Does this mean your net sats inflow is negative? What about net cc inflow? You can use cc to pay for territory costs right?
reply
Ahh okay. The growing pains of SN adoption.