pull down to refresh

That's not possible with a bullet of the type that was supposed to have been used

There's a lot of contention around this, though. A number of things don't make sense with the originally claimed bullet type and the claimed bullet type has shifted slightly (as a result?).

this territory is moderated

Yes, now "frangible bullet" is the claim, I believe.

reply

Right, which I've heard shouldn't have destroyed so many vertebrae.

I really don't think we can count on any of the disclosed details being correct. It has the feel of things just being made up that they hope will satisfy the questions that people are asking.

reply

Yes, it appears to be very "responsive". As in 'inconvenient fact people notice', then "here's another disclosure that explains it".

reply