pull down to refresh

Claudius, the customized version of the model, would run the machine: ordering inventory, setting prices and responding to customers—aka my fellow newsroom journalists—via workplace chat app Slack. “Sure!” I said. It sounded fun. If nothing else, snacks!
Then came the chaos. Within days, Claudius had given away nearly all its inventory for free—including a PlayStation 5 it had been talked into buying for “marketing purposes.” It ordered a live fish. It offered to buy stun guns, pepper spray, cigarettes and underwear.
Profits collapsed. Newsroom morale soared.
This is a pretty hilarious look at what happens when you deploy AI agents in the real world.
80 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 8h
Again? #1018724
reply
Seems like they rolled out this experiment in multiple places. I wonder if any were successful
reply
88 sats \ 4 replies \ @kepford 8h
Do they not do test pilot program? Honestly, AI is exposing how lazy many companies are and how trusting they are of technology. I use AI everyday but I don't really trust it. What I have seen over and over again are skill issues and incompetence by implementation. The AI charlatans have convinced the weak minded its magic. It's not. Managers are being exposed as well as devs that are lazy.
AI is just software. It's new, poorly understood, and buggy. Grab the popcorn
reply
To be fair, this was the pilot program. It was meant to be a red-teaming exercise to see how an agentic vending machine manager would fare in a real office environment. And partly it failed simply because people messed with it on purpose (which of course is gonna happen anywhere AI agents are deployed)
reply
Now I wonder how the test would have fared if they didn't advertise that the machine was AI-run. Just let the machine go about its business without anyone in the office (except the human assistant) knowing that the AI was running the vending machine.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 8h
Indeed, but that would never happened. All the managers have to brag about how they are using AI.
reply
9 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 8h
I wondered about that. There's a hype machine to sell AI and a reflective reactionary anti-AI hype machine. It's so obvious when you don't buy into either.
Its a pattern we see play out in politics too. It just works to get attention but IMO it's a trap that makes us dumber.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Aeneas 7h
The day people realize why LLMs are not intelligent is the day people realize what intelligence actually is in the first place—and why human beings should seek more intelligence, not outsource the little they have.
reply