pull down to refresh

Need ideas for creating couple of markets for "StackerNews 2026" on Predyx.
358 sats \ 27 comments \ @mega_dreamer 15 Dec oracle
Hey Stackers -
We need ideas for creating couple of markets for "StackerNews 2026" on Predyx. We'll seed it with abundant liquidity this time. Last year's market didn't have enough liquidity as we were still figuring out the market economics.
The 2025 markets were a big hit and we need to continue the tradition into 2026.
Here are two markets ending on Dec 31, 2025 - still a big opportunity of making few extra sats that you could use for zapping more in 2026. Cowboys with guns and hats and are welcome!!
On this market you can 2x your sats easily - if you know what you are doing: https://beta.predyx.com/market/stacker-news-hit-14m-items-in-2025
The market below 👇 is for market manipulators - who knows how to operate distributed bots. Buy bunch of YES and deploy your bots, take it to 1.5M items, rug all the naysayers. cc @0xbitcoiner @DarthCoin https://beta.predyx.com/market/stacker-news-hit-15m-items-in-2025
write
preview
related posts
101 sats \ 10 replies \ @Undisciplined 15 Dec
I haven’t looked at what the numbers should be but here are two categories for over/unders:
  1. Number of territories
  2. Total stacked
reply
69 sats \ 2 replies \ @Coinsreporter 15 Dec
I think 'Stacker News cross 100 active territories mark in 2026?' should be an intriguing ask.
What do you say?
CC: @mega_dreamer
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 15 Dec
At any point?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 15 Dec
Yes.
reply
69 sats \ 6 replies \ @mega_dreamer OP 15 Dec
Thanks - that's a good one.
Lets work on the numbers. The number should be fairly difficult to achieve but still practically achievable.
reply
101 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined 15 Dec
69 active territories on Dec 31st 100M sats spent for the year
reply
69 sats \ 4 replies \ @mega_dreamer OP 15 Dec
Nice - how does the growth goals of SN looks like for 2026. Like 20%, 40% 50% more?
Perhaps @Scoresby can tell us.
reply
101 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 15 Dec
That’s above my pay grade
reply
69 sats \ 2 replies \ @mega_dreamer OP 15 Dec
69 active territories on Dec 31st 100M sats spent for the year
Maybe I got confused - is this the 2025's number? Or are you saying it should be good number for 2026?
reply
101 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 15 Dec
For 2026
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @mega_dreamer OP 15 Dec
Thanks.
reply on another page
101 sats \ 15 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 15 Dec
These two markets are a scam! The premise should be 1.4M/1.5M paid items.
reply
0 sats \ 14 replies \ @mega_dreamer OP 15 Dec
The premise should be 1.4M/1.5M paid items.
Paid items could be an excellent resolution criteria for 2026.
reply
0 sats \ 13 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 15 Dec
Even so, it’s still possible to manipulate, but at least it wasn’t free.
reply
0 sats \ 12 replies \ @mega_dreamer OP 15 Dec
With your logic every market can be manipulated. Even the 2028 Elections, Super Bowl 2026 - all of it can be manipulated provided how much capital you can deploy to turn the odds in your favor.
reply
0 sats \ 11 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 15 Dec
True. That’s why I think all bets are a scam, and I don’t spend a single sat! Hahaha. But these two, you can manipulate for free, a total oasis for scammers! I don’t think this is good for the Predyx brand.
edited: @mega_dreamer
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @mega_dreamer OP 15 Dec
edited: @mega_dreamer I don’t think this is good for the Predyx brand
I don't think so - but thanks for sharing your opinion.
reply
0 sats \ 9 replies \ @mega_dreamer OP 15 Dec
Running bots are not free, it requires computing power and skills. If the cost of running bots are lower than your potential win than people will attempt it.
That's why bitcoin's security comes for compute and energy spend.
Ultimately it all boils down to "cost and benefit"
reply
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 15 Dec
I don’t think you get it yet, you can create unpaid items (for free) on SN, and those items are counted for these two markets.
reply
21 sats \ 7 replies \ @mega_dreamer OP 15 Dec
I get it - what I'm trying to tell you is that it takes effort (cost in terms of time spent) to create unpaid item.
view all 7 replies