pull down to refresh

25 sats \ 4 replies \ @jasonb OP 7h \ parent \ on: What other rabbit holes have you fallen into? BooksAndArticles
There’s a sequel?!?! And it’s good?!
write
preview
152 sats \ 3 replies \ @Car 4h
There’s a sequel?!?!
Yes, they did an exceptional job of combining The Thing (2011) running time: 1:43:00 min into The Thing (1982) running time: 1:49:00 min. The Thing is actually a 3:32:00 min movie.
And it’s good?!
For me it was because when you watch them back to back they flow so well.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @jasonb OP 3h
Nice, I’m going to have to check this out.
reply
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 1h
I didn't know that 2011 thing was not a remake. Definitely gonna check it out.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 1h
Went to go see it when it came out.
I was blown away because I thought we were getting a remake and when it basically rolls right into the Thing (1982) at the end, I was stunned and realized it was a prequel.
Sometimes going blind into a movie is the best way to watch them.
reply