pull down to refresh

TL;DR: For the first time in U.S. history, routine domestic air travel is being used for mass, suspicionless screening tied to civil immigration enforcement, setting a dangerous new surveillance precedent.

What’s happening with TSA quietly sharing every domestic passenger’s name with ICE is being framed as routine enforcement.
It isn’t.
For the first time, routine domestic air travel is being used as a trigger for mass, suspicionless screening tied to a civil immigration database. This is not targeted enforcement. It’s population-level screening.
That matters.
TSA was created to protect freedom of movement, not to function as a civil enforcement filter. Under this policy, people aren’t flagged because they pose a security threat or aviation risk. They’re flagged because their civil immigration status conflicts with current executive enforcement priorities.
That is a mission flip.
Historically, immigration enforcement followed criminal custody or specific investigations. Here, the act of traveling itself becomes the trigger—no warrant, no individualized suspicion, no criminal charge.
The concern isn’t deportation alone. It’s the precedent.
If the government can mine universal travel data once for civil enforcement, it can do it for anything. Taxes. Debts. Protest activity. Political targeting.
That’s not normal enforcement. It’s a structural expansion of surveillance power, and once normalized, it doesn’t contract.

What do you think? Is this a reasonable security measure or a line we shouldn’t cross?
It's been that way since 9-11. Didn't you notice all the LE standing nearby with guns and AR-15s ready to go as you went through the TSA line?
reply
Universal travel data being used for civil enforcement is new, and once normalized, it opens the door to entirely new categories of screening (e.g., non-security policy priorities).
reply
The TSA watch list has been around for years. Sorry to burst your bubble. The only difference now is that it's more aggressive. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-administration-planning-to-end-tsa-quiet-skies-traveler-surveillance-program/
reply
Appreciate the context, but we’re talking past each other. Quiet Skies = behavioral targeting of individuals flagged for security risk. Current policy = blanket sharing of all domestic passenger manifests for civil immigration enforcement. The difference: • Not “who flew suspiciously” • But “who flew, period” Security watchlists screen for threats.This uses routine travel as an immigration audit tool. That’s the line being crossed, universal surveillance infrastructure for non-security civil enforcement. Not just “more aggressive.” Categorically different use case.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
reply
@Cje95 Thoughts?
reply