pull down to refresh

Brave has been a real failure in this area.

The notion of creating a new web ecosystem uniting: Content Providers, Services, Ad-Buyers, and Users is really the only way to break the current model of web from Google.

Sadly, Eich's use of a shitcoin undermined the entire concept and is now fatally flawed (please submit your passport scan + selfie to move your $1.56 of useless shitcoin).

He should've used LN - I actually can't believe someone hasn't just forked Brave and removed all the shitcoin and replace with a LN wallet....

Isn’t the Alby browser extension making it so you can have lightning in all browsers?

reply

Right now I believe Alby is a Chrome extension, but could def see a native Lightning wallet built into other browsers too.

Notably, Impervious is launching their Lightning-native browser on April 7th, will be interesting to see what they've been building!

reply

I think the Impervious branding makes it dead in the water in terms of adoption.

But yes, the question will be if people want a separate browser or just an extension. Both have pros/cons.

Realistically, Chromium browsers are like 90% of the market though, right? I bet even Impervious is based on Chromium.

reply

They might've forked Firefox.

reply

deleted by author

Agree regarding pros/cons of extension vs browser.

For me, I think the gold ring is full browser. Imagine fully integrated paid private services: vpn, voip, email, etc.

Also you could just do neat things that would be difficult otherwise, like during a standard ecommerce checkout, generate a virtual VISA on-the-fly (paying in background by LN) for merchants that don't yet support BTC/LN.

The hard thing about all of this is getting this into mobile space and thats where browser+extension may be the winner.

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author