pull down to refresh

67 sats \ 5 replies \ @Scoresby 12 Dec \ on: Stacker Saloon
So...
source
write
preview
202 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 12 Dec
[..] allow archival nodes [..]
Replace archival with pruned and we have the current implementation. Next, someone will say "bitcoin cannot scale, and the current model of pruned and archival node modes exert centralization pressure".
TLDR; it's all been one big circlejerk, again.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 12 Dec
it's all been one big circlejerk, again.
I guess at this point it's just about who's jerking off with who
reply
171 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 12 Dec
Yes, and it's unnecessarily so. The prospect of simply implementing BIP-157 or less simply utreexo will take away most of the bottom line issues. Then they can all move on to having buttsex again, in silence.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 12 Dec
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 12 Dec
https://twiiit.com/NickSzabo4/status/1973482998927597614
reply