Never said DNS is censorship resistant.

Off topic, but using pubky for DNS is a censorship resistant (it's quite cool, uses DHT that the torrent network uses)

So a LNURL server depending on a DNS is not censorship resistant but a BIP353 address depending on the same DNS is censorship resistant.

I do not see the logic here.

DarthCoin

I don't like that it depends on things you don't actually own, meaning it's not entirely censorship resistant:

a. The domain can be taken away from you.

b. DNS records can be modified. OK, they mention DNSSEC, which I have zero experience so that angel might be covered.

The spec is more pushing BOLT12 without a webserver that is backwards compatibility to Layer 1.

bitcoin

Making Bitcoin Speak Human - Spiral Blog

Scoresby

1. It happens a lot, but It's obviously not ideal
2. LN Address depend on LNURL, which depends on an HTTP server. DNS is a little more fire and forget

I don't like that it depends on things you don't actually own, meaning it's not entirely censorship resistant:
a. The domain can be taken away from you.
b. DNS records can be modified. OK, they mention DNSSEC, which I have zero experience so that angel might be covered.

The spec is more pushing BOLT12 without a webserver that is backwards compatibility to Layer 1.