pull down to refresh
Thank you, but your questions confuse me.
TLDR: Olavo de Carvalho. Long:
- You mean some overwhelming force will prevent people from spending Bitcoin outside of this place? Then no.
- If you're talking about "regional community currencies" thing I don't like that. I think it's anti-economical and doesn't really benefit anyone except for the fact that it looks peculiar. But maybe it would work if people voluntarily moved to this place with the goal of making it a fully bitcoinized experience. In this sense it would also work with gold, friend-to-friend credit channels or some other money.
reply
Thank you too; sorry for the confusing questions: trial and error, now that I think.
Last one that should had been the first and only: Personal definition of experience and, if possible, of 'the' bitcoin-experience
reply
ahahah, I give up.
reply
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
Alright, a serious one on adoption, please:
TL;DR Question: Name your authors on sociology, philosophy and architecture (if any)
Long Question: Say we have a 'bitcoinized' place: a) We have a geographical region and within: human settlements, each with its own social/cultural structures of parts:whole; b) Some/or the whole of its inhabitants bitcoin is destined to 'build and maintain channels' (infrastructure whatsoever: roads, bridges, transport); and, c) The region is self sufficient, resources speaking; the only 'out-border' exchanges are cultural ones. Would you:
Cheers Jaff, thanks for the AMA