pull down to refresh

Here's a fun one, based of some "Finland is amazing" reports and books.
There's a reason those of us raised hereabouts (=I'm including all the Nordics here, sharing lots of heritage and similar circumstances) have a love-hate relationship to the U.S., and face a stark shock every time we visit.
Income inequality, social mobility and life expectancy in the EU all screen better than the US, even if gross domestic product doesn’t. There’s little in Europe that compares with the opioid crisis; cities are safer; infant mortality is lower. European living standards have a far smaller gap with Americans’ than GDP suggests, according to Copenhagen-based think tank Europa.
But, money talks... and convenience and innovative companies/services is amazing, and anything you're into you're gonna find in spades all over these wonderful united states. Like a 60-something, thoughtful science journalist repeatedly asked me at a political event in DC a few weeks ago (until I belatedly got his point): Why are you heeere? (Answer: because it's in the US everything is happening)
Also, the Nordics (the least crap part of Europe) isn't all it's chalked up to be.

"Happy Finland is sliding into recession and unemployment is near 10%"

Finland's "small, open economy shares a border with Russia and is exposed to Germany’s own economic weakness."
Quality of life is a strength, but power politics has upended the world economy and accentuated Europe’s weaknesses as a defense free-rider, net energy importer and technology laggard.

"You’re losing,” JPMorganChase’s Jamie Dimon told European leaders this year."

Always nice to be dizzed by Mr. Dimon.
Taking responsibility for defense, reducing fossil-fuel dependence and closing the productivity gap with the US should be Europe’s real lifestyle priorities.... And while Finland’s private sector feels the pressure to be more ambitious, the government is also looking at job-market “flexicurity,” a model pioneered by Denmark, which allows employers to more easily hire and fire workers while also ensuring they have a safety net between jobs. A new Bocconi University working paper suggests this kind of model could boost disruptive innovation in Europe.
But Lagarde, Europe is a Museum (#1020250), I wrote earlier this year:
"All Europe has to offer the world is professional soccer and nursing homes; centuries-old architecture and over-regulated, tourist-infested beaches."
I guess there is a scenario in which the Nordics get their shit together -- tech, innovation, cheap electricity, somewhat functioning infrastructure -- and actually become a place worthy of being "a lifestyle superpower."
A kid can dream.

I also find it very ironic when progressives point to the Nordic countries as models of well run economies.
First of all, they are not very racially diverse. Secondly, they are about the size of a U.S. city.
If you want US to be like the Nordics, you're basically wanting a return to small, local, racially homogeneous self governed communities. I guess I'm on board with that too???
reply
69 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 5h
Thanks. Now I don't have to type so much on my phone. You nailed it.
Also, it doesn't hurt when you have a lot of wealth that you are living off of. Socialism works better when it starts with wealth it can destroy.
reply
Secondly, they are about the size of a U.S. city.
eeeeh, state ok! Finland = Minnesota
small, local, racially homogeneous self governed communities
oh, they wanna be rural Republicans, yesyes? ...but like, with progressive values?
reply
Minnesota is smaller than either NY or LA and about the same size as the next tier of American cities. Most of our states are smaller than our largest cities.
reply
I wasn't counting the megacities. They're ridiculous
reply
69 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 5h
The point renains. Social structures are much harder to maintain when they grow and become filled with people with less in common.
The dumb people always equate this to race alone, but really it could be based on anything. The point is, is having a common cultural bond.
Its like trying to decide where to go eat with two people vs 20. Its never easy but everything doesn't scale as well as we'd like it to.
reply
An econ friend of mine told me that if you drop the bottom few percent of American counties (accounting for a trivial amount of the population) all of the notorious disparities between the US and Europe disappear.
Basically, we have a very small number of very shitty parts, but otherwise it's at least as good as Europe on whatever metric you care about.
reply
69 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 5h
That's interesting. Many statistics don't stand up to scrutiny.
reply
heard something similar re: gun violence. Take out DC/Baltimore and Chicago (and two more that I forgot...) and there wouldn't be a murder/shootings epidemic in the U.S.
reply
And, really, you don't need to take out the entire cities. If you can get granular enough data, just taking out the worst few dozen neighborhoods would be sufficient.
Also, the point isn't about cherry picking data. The point is that Europe has absolutely no analogue for those kinds of communities (although that's changing of late and the crime gap is closing accordingly).
reply
I wanna know which counties to drop, haha
reply
They're such outliers, they should be pretty easy to find. I want to say the number he told me was 20 counties (which I know is less than one percent but most datasets don't cover every county).
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 5h
gross domestic product
I'm guessing this has little to do with individual happiness or success.
reply