Here is something I don't understand about the belief that chemtrails are widely successful efforts to influence the weather: if humans can achieve such effects with some gasses or chemicals released by passenger jets, wouldn't it also be true that all our other emissions have an effect on the climate?
In July, when floods killed more than 130 people in the Texas Hill Country, an online mob blamed Rainmaker, which had seeded clouds 150 miles away two days earlier, for causing or exacerbating the tragedy. Michael Flynn, the retired general who was a short-term national security adviser in President Trump’s first administration and who has said the government manipulates hurricanes, demanded Rainmaker explain itself to his 2.2 million X followers.Within days, Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said she would introduce a bill to ban weather modification. “I’m accepting apologies now,” she wrote on X, including a photo of Doricko. “People have had enough of chemicals manipulating our weather.”Rainmaker said its cloud seeding in Texas had dispersed before the storm and that at best a single mission can create a fraction of an inch of rain. More than 20 inches of rain fell in some locations during the floods, according to the National Weather Service.The stakes are high as farmers look for ways to keep operating amid the West’s worsening droughts, a trend over the past 20 years. Proponents say cloud-seeding is a valuable long-term strategy to ease the dry conditions that have hit farmers and play a role in devastating wildfires.
Rephrasing my question: if you believe chemtrails are real, do you also believe that human-caused climate change is real?