pull down to refresh

Bitcoin: The Money Backed by Human Action
In the fiat world, people ask: “What backs this currency?” With gold: value is backed by natural scarcity. With fiat: value is backed by governments and enforced belief. But Bitcoin is different. Bitcoin isn’t backed by matter or political power — it’s backed by human action.
Bitcoin exists because of real human actions in the physical world:
Individuals running nodes to enforce the rules.
Miners spending real energy to secure the network.
People choosing self-custody, rejecting centralization.
Peer-to-peer users preserving the permissionless spirit.
Communities using Bitcoin daily, turning it into an economy.
And those who DCA, choosing to save in Bitcoin instead of meaningless consumption.
Every bit of Bitcoin’s value is created by human action — not government promises.
The economist Ludwig von Mises once said:
“All economic value originates from human action.”
Bitcoin is a living example of this truth. No one commands Bitcoin to have value. No one stands behind it as a guarantor. No one has the authority to reset the system.
Bitcoin’s value comes from millions of free, voluntary, and decentralized human actions across the world.
When you run a node, you are the validator. When you mine, you power the network. When you self-custody, you protect your own monetary sovereignty. When you transact in Bitcoin, you turn it into real money.
Bitcoin doesn’t need backing from governments because it is backed by you — by deliberate action, by the choice to live freely, and by the responsibility you accept when holding your private key.
In fiat, you depend on others. In Bitcoin, you are the standard.
And that is why Bitcoin is not just a currency — it is a human revolution: A form of money backed by human action — by human freedom in its purest form.

Read more at: https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsdhnqpqu5fn0awztp3dgqvjdegnztlndkdx00epu3hgn85yyffh5gueyxc6
https://m.stacker.news/120081
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @brent 1 Dec
In Eric Yakes’s book, The 7th Property, he explains the history and meaning of the phrase, “backed by”, and why it doesn’t apply to Bitcoin, for the same reason that it doesn’t apply to gold.
Once upon a time, bank notes were IOUs, entitling the holder to redeem the note for the specified amount of gold that was “backing” the note. That’s why the paper notes were said to be “backed by” gold. They were placeholders for real money. Real money was “hard money”, that took actual work in the real world, impacting the human economy, to create. Or, as you have put it, it required human action.
Then in 1971, Nixon ruggged the world by removing the redeemability of dollars for gold, turning them into pure fiat money, with no backing, only the political promise that the government is good for it. Whatever that means. Amazingly, the masses just carried on, pretending nothing had changed, even though the value of the “money” they were earning was now losing value on the whims of the political class of the day.
Like gold, Bitcoin is the thing of value. It’s what required hard work in the real world to produce. This work in the real world affected the human economy — people were paid for their labor, resources were acquired and put to use, services were consumed and paid for. That real work is what allows hard money to accurately convey price signal, to convey actual costs of things in the world — it is a feedback mechanism, part of the causal loop of economic reality. This is a necessary property of good money. Without that property, when money is just created from thin air at a keystroke, it fails to convey the true cost of things in the world; the price signal becomes distorted.
Bitcoin is the sort of thing that does the backing for promissory notes. It is not an IOU that is “backed by” something else more valuable. It is the money.
reply
“Excellent — thank you for investing your time and energy into this comment. It carries a lot of real knowledge, and the journey ahead is still very long to make Bitcoin truly succeed and become a transactional currency in the future.”
reply