pull down to refresh
I feel like it's the input vs. output rates of the information that dictate whether "social media" feels like a net gain/loss.
with a blog, we're composing/drafting/publishing... it's mostly output, and then there's not much more for us to do (unless you get lots of comments as inputs). blogs are largely expressive, and not very passive.
the "feed" of social media, whether it's SN's RSS or FB's algo, is the part that (I suppose) feels like ick.
re: #1, you could tag your Spirit Animal post "nature" or "personal" or "self-analysis"
reply
Having more control over a blog than over a social media feed/profile does resonate with me.
I wasn't much of a social media user until 2018. Even then mostly a lurker until I came to SN. But I've been writing blogs for twenty years at least. Blogs are much more elegant.
But the problem with blogs that I never felt like karlsson never fully addressed, is how to get them in front of people so they can perform the function of searching for fascinating people.
The internet is awash with posts and writing and stuff and there's no guarantee that anyone will come to my lonely little site. Social media, more than anything else, comes with the promise that someone will respond to me.
If one steps away from social media, how do you actually get your words in front of people?
reply
Good point, I only found out about Karlsson because @elvismercury kept sharing links to his blog here.
reply
Footnotes