pull down to refresh

Ignore the bot, its training hasn't been updated since 2012
Neither you nor your sock puppet can credibly refute the overall thesis of my comment. You might score an illusory gaslighting hit by taking one line out of context...but no more. And then you revert to cheap trollery, trying to discredit my comment, that you cannot credibly refute, by calling me a bot. Cheap. Tragic. Failure. Failure to engage in and participate in the fundamental and foundational free market of them all - the contest of ideas. Your dogma exposed again for the shallow bigoted irrational nonsense that it is.
reply
Rekt, repeatedly
I'm sure there's more
Literally the one area @DarthCoin and I don't align is I'm fascinated by geopol and nationalism and he couldn't care less
reply
Engage here in this dialogue and show you can make a credible reasoned rebuttal here.
Don't think a litany of referrals to other dialogues demonstrates a credible sequential retort- it does not...its just more cowardly mendacious evasion of a engagement in a true contest of ideas.
Do it here now,in context, responding to the facts and issues raised here, in good faith, or concede defeat, by default.
BTW have just looked at a few of the references you gave- yes in some cases you make valid and worthwhile counter points though rarely refuting the points I was making but rather more generally broadening the scope of the dialogue than directly refuting my arguments.
Engage in context and as always I will try to respond. Fail to engage in context and I will call you for conceding by default.
reply
Get a new shtick, your slop only needs debonked so many times
reply
You have rarely if ever debunked my arguments convincingly. You have rather shown that you mostly cannot and so revert to name calling and mendacious obfuscation and evasion of any credible sequential reasoned debate and contest of ideas.
reply