I'm impressed by your fairly reasonable take, when I saw that you replied I honestly expected you to roast me or imply that I'm debating in bad faith with the examples I'm presenting.

However, it's concerning to me that there are still devs and influencers who are trying to police the way that others use their own bitcoin.

The fact that we still refer to it as "permissionless", advocate for building a market for block space and suggest that "Bitcoin is for enemies" while we agree that some legitimate use cases that the network enables are attacks or spam is one sweet piece of irony. These people have no issue still calling themselves libertarians.