pull down to refresh

With their common stock in free-fall, down about 64% since July, it is harder for Strategy to raise enough capital to meet their debt and dividend payments. Their efforts to pump $STRC to $100 will be even more costly and probably even less successful -- it only reached $100 8 out of 118 days, and has not yet closed a day at $100. I'm sure that their Nasdaq 100 inclusion is helping with funding, but its adding weight to the common stock.
HOWEVER, the elephant in the room is that Strategy owns 649,870 BTC. It is worth about $55 billion today, down from $82 billion last month. Their debt-to-capital ratio is now around 14%, comparable to Microsoft. They could take out loans against their BTC stash, if necessary.
If you are of the belief that BTC is likely to continue dropping and stay at much lower price levels for at least an extended period, then Strategy looks very precarious indeed.
On the other hand, the BTC price has followed global liquidity levels for over a decade. For the past year or two, governments have been tightening the money supply, in an effort to control post-pandemic inflation. This has caused a liquidity glut, with major economies either in a recession, or teetering on one. That seems likely to be coming to an end soon. Japan just announced a ¥21 trillion injection to kick off the liquidity party. So the BTC bear market probably won't last long, as money printers return to their default setting of Brrrrrr.
Time will tell if the scale-invariant behaviour that BTC has established continues to hold. If it does, and the coming liquidity cycle pushes the BTC price up another 10x, what will that say for Strategy's credibility? 🧐
61 sats \ 4 replies \ @freetx 20h
The biggest problem Bitcoin Treasury Companies have is not obvious on first look. Their biggest problem is shareholder have no access to their fundamental NAV.
If you buy a share of MSTY and it dips below NAV, what can you do as a shareholder? The concept of "efficient markets" and "valuations" is great, but at the end of the day an electronic stock certificate really means nothing. The stock can dip below NAV forever and there is not much you can do as an equity holder to access that underlying asset....about the only thing is to oust the CEO and install one who promises to sell the assets to raise cash to do a stock buyback.
But that itself is double-edged sword. If stock price is below NAV with the current assets....what will stock price do after new-CEO sells the assets? In theory the price should rise if he is promising to buy back stock with the cash....but well the market already doesn't value the NAV story....so good luck.
In the end, the entire stock market is you giving your cash to some random 3rd party and hoping you get something back in return....ultimately stocks are a bigger fiat than "fiat".
reply
9 sats \ 3 replies \ @brent 19h
No one buys a stock with the expectation of access to the contents of the company's treasury, when the company is still operating. Traders are free to buy and sell the stock as they wish, according to NAV or any other criteria.
Strategy is executing a speculative attack on the dollar by leveraging the equities market to accumulate bitcoin. Raising unlimited dollars to buy limited bitcoins. If you think the price of BTC is going to rally, MSTR might rally even more. And vice versa, in the other direction.
reply
11 sats \ 2 replies \ @freetx 19h
No one buys a stock with the expectation of access to the contents of the company's treasury
Then what are you buying?
If you think the price of BTC is going to rally, MSTR might rally even more.
well.....the price of MSTR is already below NAV, so what will BTC rallying do it? Maybe it rises at 0.9x NAV?
Imagine I sold you "shares in a gold mine" but I made it clear there was no possible way you would ever be allowed to access the gold, in fact I forbade you from even looking at it...would you do it? If so, I have a gold mine to sell you.
reply
5 sats \ 1 reply \ @brent 1h
People buy stocks for NGU
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 37m
...ultimately stocks are a bigger fiat than "fiat".
reply
Logic seems sound; my concern is and has always been the implicit tautology: if btc does great, strategy and its derivatives are probably fine. Maybe super-fine.
But it's basically complicated leverage crossed with a ponzi and a dose of speculative attack, with built-in assumptions about number going up for the whole rickety machine to keep toppling forward.
In situations where btc is having trouble for one reason or other, what happens to these nested Rube Goldberg machines? That's what I want to know.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @brent 20h
Yeah it's pretty crazy but we're finding out! 👀
I suspect the money printers will continue going brrrr, and magic internet money has a fixed supply, so...
reply