pull down to refresh
102 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 10h \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon
I still remember million sat madness where the whole rewards of a month were given to just 64 stackers, including 1 million to the top.
I remember not enjoying that. My philosophy would be that rewards should feel smooth, not lumpy, and that it should be a reliable, and fairly predictable, incentive for consistent participation.
MSM wasn't pleasant, I agree. And probably i agree with you that rewards ought to be aimed at being predictable. Yet I wonder if there isn't a short enough time frame, and a small enough reward sum, that makes the random winner mode feel more like fun and less like dreadfulness.
reply