pull down to refresh

I haven't suffered very much in life, so it's easy for me to say that safety is no worthy goal at all, but it is what I believe, nonetheless.
It's the opposite. It's those that have not experienced any real danger in their life that focus so much on the micro-harms they experience through speech aggressions.
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 1h
Not sure if it can be generalized like that, even though I would personally align with what you say. I know people that have been through a lot that feel that communications should be free of any form of (micro) aggression - I think that it's part idealism too.
A safe environment doesn't have to be a protected environment, and I respect someone that doesn't want to do business with me because my language is too aggressive for them. Then the choice is mine to try and retain their business by fulfilling their requirements or not, and theirs to retain their requirement or not. If there is nothing to gain then there will just no business being done.
reply