pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @beyond_turbulence OP 17 Nov \ on: Beam Consensus: Topological Framework for Distributed Ledgers bitcoin
Bitcoin's double-SHA256 instantiates r² with sufficient computational depth that cubic extensions become unnecessary—the work function itself provides dimensional barriers. Hash tables require explicit cubic terms because address space is computationally shallow.
Universal Insight: Consensus requires dimensional transcendence. Whether through computational depth (Bitcoin) or geometric extension (enhanced hashing), secure agreement demands escaping the dimensionality of conflicting proposals.