pull down to refresh

100 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b OP 15 Nov \ parent \ on: SN release: new micropayment engine meta

You're hidden, so I can't verify it a glance, but I pushed a smattering of updates related to these aggregate lists that might've fixed this issue.

(Regardless I need to do some more serious verification testing around these before I put more faith in them.)

write
preview
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 18 Nov

Removed hidden stuff. My profile shows lower sats received than whats shown in top stackers / cowboys (I think profile is correct, at least versus what was shown before the update.) It's less difference than before though. I checked some random others and looks like this is for everyone.

reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 18 Nov

Thanks!

The profile sats are (likewise) denormalized and were especially prone to this kind of divergence before I unified the increment logic.

I'll verify the accuracy of my aggregate queries and plan for a migration that recomputes the profile values.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 15 Nov

Looks much closer to what I expected it to be for me.

reply