pull down to refresh
42 sats \ 1 reply \ @88b0c423eb 17h \ on: Peter McCormack calls Bitcoin Knots “Retards” bitcoin
Hard to tell, we need more time. It's hard to say when people like Nick Szabo that knows much more than the average pleb is supporting knots, but still very smart people make big mistakes. Luke of course acts very weird sometimes and have very strange ideas. I think the truth is in the middle knots folks got some things right, but bip 444 is totally retarted the same way that core folks are retarted when uplifting the opreturn limit
he's acting retarded, because Knots fork attack was never about stopping spam to begin with, let alone solving the issue of illegal content (CSAM) - neither knots nor core actually help with that. Luke is saving bicoin by threatening to destroy it.
"a private Knots fork with utreexo -- batteries included, fully regression tested, and from the rumors I have heard massively more performant tuned than libfloresta, whatever Tadge Dryja originally produced, and the various other test clients like mit-dci/utreexo which I guess was in go.
It's possible Luke has been working on this since he had the lightbulb about making segwit a softfork"
#ReleaseTheFiles
🫵🏼🎄✖️⭕
I don't think mechanic believes the fork exists, either that or that he is being used. Kratter probably knows and is playing along.
Szabo / Samson Mao, hard to say. Probably some PR angle for Jan3. But I would assume almost everybody on the inside knows by now.
reply